www.SilentMajority.co.UK
SOS November 2001.rtf

DO PLEASE download and print as many copies of this for distribution
as possible
also forward the URL and also the SOS NewsLetter in ‘e’mail format.

E—mail contacts
Newsletter :	Lpbans5@aol .com
Messages :		blakeukip@hotmail. com

Save our Sovereignty
2, Claires Close, Brimscombe, Stroud, Glos: GL5 2RQ
01453 885141

E-Mails  I have two friends  offer me the use of their e—mail , and you will notice that I have divided these between messages back to me , and sending out the newsletter. I  hope this will prove helpful.

Many, many thanks to all those who have sent in donations and stamps ,these are truly welcome. Thank you also to those who pass on the SOS newsletter to others. I am receiving a steady stream of requests from newcomers to be placed on the mailing list.

WESTMINSTER RALLY

On the 17th October, 2000 people, from all over the country, made the trip to
Westminster to lobby their MPs and persuade them not to vote for the Treaty of
Nice (figures from the police confirmed by the Democracy Movement’s own counting).
I, personally, arrived at 12.30 p.m. and left at 6.30 p.m. but there were people
there when I arrived and some still there when I left.

We were allowed into the lobby 20 at a time where we filled in a green slip requesting our MP to come to the lobby and speak to us. Bearing in mind that this was the first Prime Minister’s Question Time with lain Duncan Smith, most MPs were in the House. The tearooms and bars were full and yet very few MPs took the trouble to come to the lobby to face their constituents. One group received a message that their Labour MP was not there so you can imagine their surprise when they spotted her creeping through the lobby. I am pleased to say that they cornered her but I have no idea of the conversation.

I made the remark that most MPs would not have read the Treaty, most would not bother to attend the debate, but all would be there at voting time. To test this out, some went into the Strangers’ Gallery and reported that no more than 20 MPs were present. This is the kind of representation we receive when a Treaty of vital importance to our independence is discussed and yet they could all turn up for Question Time to ‘bay’ at each other across the floor of the House.

We have councilors to take care of local issues — when we elect an MP it is their duty to safeguard the interests of the British people. Our sojourn at Westminster proved, without a shadow of doubt, that once elected, the majority of them could not care less.

The People — The above did not apply to the 2000 who gave up their day to attend at Westminster. There were hundreds of flags flying, people were dressed in Union flags with Union bowlers and umbrellas. We sang Land of Hope & Glory (correct words), Jerusalem and There’ll always be an England. There was a large purple banner, with silver lettering, which read ‘Youth Against a Federal Europe

This gathering of extreme rightwing xenophobic little Englanders came from the
Labour left Campaign Against a Federal Europe (CAEF), Labour Euro—Safeguards
Campaign, Campaign for an Independent Britain, Freedom Association, Anti—Maastricht
Alliance, Democracy Movement, UKIP and many other smaller groupings.

Media Coverage — The BBC was, once again, noticeable by its absence. A phone call from the Democracy Movement asking why they were not there, earned a few seconds coverage on BBC 2’s Dispatch Box which goes out at midnight. One can understand the BBC’s reluctance because the idea that people of all political persuasions are opposed to the EU does not sit well with their Europhile policy that opposition comes from a minority of extreme right-wingers.

However, what about the newspapers that are supposed to be on the side of the people? The Times had a few lines with a photo of one man with a sticker on his head — from the Daily Telegraph, Daily Mail and the Sun there was nothing. The Morning Star had the best coverage — they explained why we were there.

This is not the first time the so—called anti—EU press has let us down. The lO,OOO —strong Democracy Movement march in October 2000 elicited a piece in the Telegraph’s Peterborough column that called us a rabble. No wonder people feel there is nothing they can do when the entire media, both TV and press, are operating a blackout on the valiant efforts being made to alert the population to the dangers they face.

THE VOTE — The Treaty of Nice passed through the House of Commons with 392 for and
158 against. From the information I have, Labour MPs Denzil Davies and Dennis
Skinner voted against whilst John Cryer, Austin Mitchell and David Drew abstained.
On the Tory side, Kenneth Clarke, Ian Taylor and David Curry abstained whilst
Robert Jackson (Wantage) voted for.

NOTE — A recent report states that MPs would like counselors to help with the stress of their job and the incidents of alcoholism. I would suggest that the stress comes from trying to avoid their constituents and, if they did the job they are paid to do, there would be less time to spend in the bars. I wonder how the Ml’s managed (a lot less of them) when they ran an Empire instead of rubber stamping the Treaties, Regulations and Directives that emanate from Brussels.

REGIONALISATION

Since the South West Constitutional Convention on 19th May, I have been trying to obtain a copy of the minutes which we were promised. In July, I was told they were not yet ready but would be issued, in brochure form at the beginning of September and sent to Colleges, Universities etc. In October, I was told that no minutes were taken as such and a summary of the Convention would be issued, along with the Government White Paper on the Regions, in January 2002.

What the summary will contain is best expressed by Ms Southcott, who organised the Convention, when she wrote to likeminded people (not the antis) “After the successful launch of the South West Constitutional Convention...” This was anything but a success which is why we will not have a sight of the summary until it has been widely circulated.

A Government spokesman tells us that the Government does not intend to hold any formal public meetings to inform the people of this enormous change in how we are to be governed — this is to be left to the Regions. And how will they do it? Doctored documents will be issued on the only real public meeting held in the South West on 19th May (which was meant to be a rubber stamping exercise); those that refused to sign a founding statement in favour of an elected Assembly in July were left sitting whilst the pros moved to another room with a guard on the door. I have now been informed by Ms Southcott that there is to be another meeting on November 22nd at the County Hall in Taunton,Somerset. However, only those who signed the founding statement will receive an invitation — it is a closed shop.

The Soviet—style cells that now operate in the Regions are funded by our District and County Councils. Taxpayer's money is being used to help fund Regional Assemblies whose sole purpose is to link themselves up to Brussels and become part of the Europe of Regions — all pretence of democracy has been dropped.

The idea that these Assemblies have nothing to do with Brussels has been knocked on the head by a report in the Stroud News & Journal (24/10) by Dr. Caroline Jackson, Tory MEP, under the heading ‘MEP outlines Brussels role’. She said “I see no reason why the South West office in Brussels (cost to the taxpayer of £100,000 p.a.) should not ultimately be staffed by people from the Region and act as a focus for young people who want to spend a short time there, training on the job in Brussels ... it will gradually increase the poo1 of local people who know about Brussels and realise it holds no terrors, but many opportunities.

Of course, it holds opportunities for people like her who love the gravy train. For people like me, it does not represent terror but a complete abdication of any form of democracy for the rest of us who have to pick up the bill for the burgeoning army of bureaucrats and hangers-on whose very jobs depend on preventing the electorate from having a say.

SHIRE COUNTIES

The Tory line on Regional Assemblies has always been that they will abolish them as they are an extra tier of Government. Despite this policy, no Tory Minister or councilor has attended the Regional Assembly or Convention to find out what is going on, although they are deluged with information. It would appear that someone has been listening to them and has decided to remove this barrier.

On 15th November, Lord Falconer told the House of Lords that three tiers of local Government would be too many and they are looking at county and district councils. However, Labour has made repeated hints that they would like to get rid of County Councils (which is confirmed by the map I have which shows the county borders in the South West have been removed). These Shire Counties are bastions of the Tories
— remove them and you remove the Conservatives as a fighting force — no wonder Lib/Dems claim they are going to be the main opposition.

Perhaps, at long last, the Tory opposition will stop concentrating all their fire on trying to get a Government Minister’s scalp, as they did in the last Parliament, and come out into the country and engage with the electorate. Although it will be hard to admit that our present perilous state is largely due to them, it is never too late to say sorry and start helping the people to fight back before Labour demolishes the Tories. I won’t hold my breath.

BRUGES GROUP CONFERENCE

I was invited to the above group’s annual conference on 3rd November — the theme was ‘An alternative to the EU’. The distinguished speakers debunked any suggestion that we must be in the EU. I give below a short summary.

Prof. Christie Davies (University of Reading) — explained why we should not be in the EU but should look towards the wider English—speaking world. He also mentioned the sinister moves being made in the Regions and, in particular, the debacle in the South West.

The Rt.Hon. Don McKinnon (New Zealand), Commonwealth Secretary General — he was not allowed to make political points but he pointed out that when the UK joined the EEC, there were just 20 Commonwealth members. Now there are 54 and he has 6 more application letters on his desk. These countries straddle the five continents and are held together by a common language (when they speak they all know what they mean), same laws etc. He even said that, apart from Canada, they all understood cricket.

He was convinced that with the UK playing its rightful role in the Commonwealth, this could become a dynamic force for good in the world.

Dr. John Hulsman (Senior European Analyst at the Heritage Foundation in Washington DC) — he was against all blocks that prevent sovereign states from having bilateral trading agreements with each other. He could not understand why a global trader like the UK could allow someone else to decide whom they could trade with.
He also smashed the Europhile argument that inward investment would dry up unless we integrated with the EU. He pointed out that if the USA had wanted to invest in the EU, it could have done so in Germany or France. It did not because of the stranglehold Governments had which prevented businesses from growing. The investment came to the UK precisely because it was not a continental country. Should we become one, money will be removed and invested in places like Singapore.

Dr. Hulsman is in his mid—thirties and a real 21st century man — his verdict, we would be signing our own death warrant if we submerged ourselves in the EU.

Prof. Ivar Raig (Estonian academic and Director of the research centre for Free Europe) — Estonia is recognised by the OECD as the most free country in Europe. It is a democracy; it has no tariffs; its economy is growing; there is no business tax provided profits are ploughed back into the business; and it trades freely with everyone except the EU. Its largest trading partner used to be Finland but, since Finland joined the EU, tariffs have been placed on all trade.

In order to join the EU, they have to replace all the restrictions they removed when they broke from the Soviet Union — this would put them back 10 years and take them from a growing economy to a paralysed one. Fifty per cent of the population is opposed to membership but the Government is not listening (does this ring a bell?). However, they must have a referendum so there is hope.

Anthony Coughlan (leader of the Irish ‘no’ Campaign) — Referenda in Ireland are not advisory — the results have to become law. However, instead of telling the EU that the people have spoken, Bertie Aherne (Irish Prime Minister) told the other EU leaders to go ahead and ratify the Treaty of Nice. He would then hold another referendum and ask the people whether they wanted to be isolated now that every other country had agreed — BLACKMAIL. You do not have to look any further than this one episode to know that, inside the EU, democracy, and the peoples right to choose, is totally absent.

There were many more speakers and all were of the opinion that the people of the UK must fight this European/Soviet and, in saving themselves, save the other peoples of Europe.

DON’T MENTION THE BRITISH

For the first time in our history, we have a Prime Minister who dislikes the British and, more specifically, the English. Can anyone name a former Prime Minister who has had to proclaim, publicly, that he was patriotic and appoint a patriotic minister to convince us of this? His dislike does not just apply to people in this country but stretches out to those, be they living in part of the UK or in Crown Dependencies, who wish to remain British.

Northern Ireland — Mr. Blair persuaded the British to sign the Good Friday Agreement by promising them that they would remain part of the UK for as long as they voted for it. However, he did not tell them that they would be stripped of all signs of their Britishness in order to appease Sinn Fein/IRA.

Before any decommissioning took place, they had to accept that cross—border institutions would be set up that would allow the Irish Government a direct say in their affairs. The Royal Ulster Constabulary had to be disbanded and become the Police Force of Northern Ireland; the Oath of Allegiance to the Queen was removed and their badge (already a shamrock and crown) is to be replaced by something else. Sinn Fein Ministers were put in charge of education and health, although neither of them recognises the British Government even though we pay their salaries. Plaques that appear in every Crown Court in the UK have been removed because they represent the Queen’s Courts. There is an argument going on as to whether any Union flag should fly from Government buildings.

Following the limited decommissioning, General de Chastelain was asked a few
questions. Did he know where the weapons were? No, it could have been in the north or south Ireland or even Scotland. Did he know how many weapons were decommissioned? No, but it was a symbolic gesture. Did he know how these were put beyond use? No. Had he got any further dates for decommissioning? No. This was hailed by Tony Blair, John Reid and all republicans as a major step by the IRA and, with indecent haste, watchtowers were pulled down and, during the night, RUC emblems and memorabilia were removed from police stations.

What the people of Northern Ireland have left is a British passport but you could hold one of these in any place in the world but it would not mean that it was your country.

Gibraltar — was Islamic for 751 years and Spanish for just 242 years. They became British under the Treaty of Utrecht in 1713. In 1969, a preamble was added to the constitution drafted by Sir Frederic Bennett, Sir Anthony Rushford, Sir Robert Peliza and Maurice Xiberras. It was the intention of these draughtsman that no change of Gibraltar’s sovereignty could take place without the freely and democratically express wishes of the Gibraltarians (Telegraph 13/11). They have continually insisted that they wished to remain British despite the fact that Spain has carried out a war of attrition against them which is unlawful under EU rules. It is this destruction of another constitution that Blair intends.

A few weeks ago, friends in Australia asked me if I had heard of the secret deal Blair was about to do with the Prime Minister of Spain, Jose Maria Aznar — there was a write up in a Melbourne newspaper. On Saturday (10/11), the news hit our newspapers. As usual, Mr. Blair is prepared to sacrifice others in his quest for personal gain.

Mr. Ham, Europe Minister, discussed Gibraltar on Radio 4 (9/11) and was asked if he could reassure the Gibraltarians who prided themselves on their Britishness. He said “I can reassure them very clearly. First, they will be consulted on their future (but not have a veto) and, second, I can give a pledge that we will never ask them to sacrifice their British citizenship unless they freely choose to do so”.

Like the Northern Irish, the Gibraltarians will be allowed to keep their British citizenship but have no say in which country they belong too. On 14/11, Tony Blair told the House of Commons that there was a mechanism in Brussels to solve the problem (the people do not have a problem), it is in the interest of the people of Gibraltar. Who decided — he did, just like he has decided it is in our interest to integrate with the EU.

British Overseas Territories — There are some 16 countries which are semi—independent but are Crown territories. Unlike France, who made all her former colonies part of the EU, these territories are not. Many of them are financial centres and the EU wants to regulate them. Ask the Channel Islands what this will mean to their economy. Or the Falklands who,having been rescued from Argentinian rule. will now find themselves under EU rule.

There is a Bill going through the House of Lords to remove these territories from the Crown and place them directly under the control of Brussels. Have they been consulted? No. They are pawns in the game, just like us, to enhance our leader’s prestige in the EU and help him to reach the highest pinnacle. Do not expect this man to look after British interests — it is Blair’s interests that are paramount.

ABUSE OF POWER

The President of the most powerful country in the world, the USA, has much less power than our present Prime Minister. The President has to be elected by the people and moves into the White House with his own team. His checks and balances are provided by the House of Representatives and the Senate, all of whom are elected. They can have different majority parties in each House and neither of them need to be from the same party as the President. This means that major decisions by the President have to be approved by both Houses before they can be acted upon and that includes going to war.

Three times since 1997 Tony Blair has sent our troops into battle. On each occasion he did not feel it necessary to tell our representatives let alone ask permission. He does not seek Cabinet consensus and treats the House of Commons with contempt. One by one, he has removed the checks that helped to rein in a Prime Minister. He has surrounded himself with unelected advisers whose claim to fame seems to be that they were journalists, BBC wallahs, or knew him in the old days. That is why the spin is so good — they are used to the headlines.

Accompanying him on his trips as self—appointed World leader was Anji Hunter, head of his private office, and Alistair Campbell, his Communications Director, who could be clearly seen sitting in on negotiations with leaders of other countries. Where were the Secretary of Defence or the Foreign Secretary?

President Bush has made many speeches to the nation since 11th September, the Prime Minister has made none.

WHAT PRICE DEMOCRACY?

Following 11th September, the Prime Minister made a speech at the Labour Conference. Most of it was fantasy as he told us he was going to sort out the world’s problems personally. The last part of his speech is the one we should have taken note of. He said “the kaleidoscope has been shaken. Before the pieces settle, we must reorder the world”.

Although not politically correct, I would remind people that, in the 30’s, there was another European who had these grandiose visions. When he was elected, he put the people back to work and restored their pride, which ensured his second election. He then set about ensuring that his power was supreme. He got rid of dissenters; he politised the judiciary; he abolished elections. When the people realised what was happening, they found that democracy had disappeared, there was no legitimate way they could curb his excesses and those who tried to remove him (like some of the military did) paid with their lives.

There is no suggestion that our Prime Minister intends to take up arms. However, there are other ways of obtaining complete control. Since 1997, from the House of Lords to local authorities, democratic control is being removed. The Queen is being sideline; the Constitution ripped up; and Magna Carta and the Bill of Rights ignored.

A control freak leader of one party, and a small inner court of his friends, are destroying a nation in order to realise that leader’s dream — a European/Soviet — which he hopes will be a stepping stone to a World Government in which he will pay a prominent part.

We should stop asking why the German people did not stop Hitler. We should ask why we are letting the same thing happen to us.

HOUSE OF LORDS

New Labour whipped up hatred of the Lords by constantly claiming “why should unelected hereditary peers make the laws of the land”. This, of course, was a lie. The Lords have never had the power to make laws — they could ask the Government to think again and hold up legislation but, in the end, the Government was entitled to have its way. They were, however, the highest court in the land and guardians of our constitution.

Hereditary Peers — all but 92 of these were removed immediately. Their crime was that they were in the Lords by right and there was no lever the Government could use to make them ‘toe the line’. Under the final reform, all hereditaries will go.

Life Peers — in 4 years, the Prime Minister has made 248 Life Peers against 216 in 11 years of Tory Government. Unfortunately, once elevated to the Lords, these Peers become independently minded and could not be relied on to ‘vote the right way’. Under the final reform, Life Peers will only be there for 5, 10 or 15 years. The Wakeham Commission recommended 15 years but this is too long for the Government as their continual presence in the Lords will depend upon how they vote.

MAKE—UP OF THE NEW LORDS

We were promised Peoples Peers but we were not told that we were not going to be the people who decided.

20% will be appointed by an ‘independent committee which is not to decide on merit but on a politically correct agenda of 30% male, 30% female (what will the 40% be?) and a correct mix of ethnic minorities, different faiths etc.

20% are to be elected but not by us. The closed lists used in the European Election is the favoured method. This means we shall have to vote for a party and they will decide who gets elected.

60% are to be appointed by political parties in proportion to the number of votes each party received at a general election. If we take the last election a Labour majority in the Commons will be reflected in the Lords — no opposition. It is also assumed that there will representatives from the regions but, knowing what is happening there, it feels me with horror that these same people will decide who will represent me in the second chamber.

EUROPEAN UNION

This august body has lost no time in using the terrorist attack to enhance their own power. Blair used his Labour Party speech to link the Euro with the fight against terrorism. He used a speech at the Lord Mayor’s Banquet to say that we need closer ties with the EU (code word for integration). What seems to escape him is that, had we been integrated, he would not have been able to announce his ‘shoulder to shoulder’ bit until he had discussed it with other EU leaders and then Javier Solano, Foreign Minister of the EU, would have made the announcement. Nor would he have been able to send our soldiers if we had been in the Euro because we would no longer have control of our finances.

We are told that this crisis has shown how we all pull together in the EU and yet, whereas Australia, Canada and New Zealand immediately offered to help, the EU members talked about it. They decided that they would not commit forces to winkle out the terrorists but would help in peacekeeping once it was all over. France will do her own thing and go in, complete with engineers, because there will be a lot of contracts on offer for rebuilding. A Commission official was asked whether the EU would be involved in restructuring. Of course, he said. When asked who would nay for this, he loftily said ‘the EU taxpayer’. So there you have it. We shall pay for the war and the rebuilding.

Romani Prodi (Commission President) spelt out the future for us in a speech in Bruges on 13th November. Brussels wants far—reaching new powers over government spending, foreign policy, defence and police. The Commission, he said, was planning to tighten its grip over the tax and spending policy of the member states. He described the new instrument he is proposing as ‘a mechanism for managing the economy’ (i.e. an economic Government). He called for ‘the entire foreign and security policy of the union to be brought under EU control. He wants enhanced powers for Europol and for ‘the creation of an integrated European police force’ (a federal police force). All this, apparently, is necessary to combat terrorism as is the EU—wide arrest warrant.

ANTI—TERRORISM LAW
definition of terrorism (he wants it to include other ‘crimes’). He would like to see some 30 areas covered by the EU—arrest warrant — he said they should have faith in each others judicial system. That would be fine if the continental system was the same as ours — it is not. For a long time, Brussels has tried to get CORPUS JURIS to replace our Common Law — Mr. Blunkett intends to help them with his new Anti—Terrorism Bill. The EU—wide arrest warrant will do away with extradition procedures; it will allow you to be arrested on suspicion and removed to the country issuing the warrant; you can be detained for up to 6 months, with reviews which will allow you to be held indefinitely. At no time will you be brought before a court; you will not be told of the charges against you (for security reasons, they say); there will be no opportunity to mount a defence.

Just what are the 30 areas that Mr. Blunkett wishes to be brought under these draconian measures? Will we be safer? The answer, of course, is no. The safest route would be to tighten our borders against mass immigration; hold in custody those with dubious claims instead of losing them into the community; and deport the undesirables. Then is an opt—out clause in the Human Rights Act which allows deportation in a national emergency — the French have triggered this clause, we have not. Our Government wishes to bring in measures that infringe on the liberties of the many whilst doing nothing to stop the few. Don’t you feel a bit queasy putting such power in the hands of Government?

So where does this leave the Tories who insist, even under their new leader, that he would never take us out of the EU? We need to know what mechanism they would use to prevent all the above happening. If they go into negotiations saying ‘no matter what you do, we will not leave , we might just as well vote for a new party that offers us just that or resign ourselves to the fact that the Council Chamber at Westminster will take its orders from Brussels and our votes are irrelevant.

The history of Europe is littered with power hungry people with a vision. These visions have never benefited the ordinary people. All have suffered as one meglo— maniac after another has tried to create an Empire in his own image. For the first time, all the European countries are democracies and yet they have come up with a collective vision despite the wishes of their people. Once again, we shall all pay the price as we eventually fight our way out of another evil Empire.

GENERAL AGREEMENT ON TRADE IN SERVICES

This month, the World Trade Organization has been meeting to discuss this. BBC Newsnight had a confidential document which they showed to an interviewee (whose name I did not get) and his reaction was worth noting. He said that if he had not seen this document, he would never have believed that our Government had given so much power over this country to corporate business.

Dispatches on Channel 4 did a programme on what the WTO means to poor countries. They showed that where they had been forced to privatize water, for example, ordinary people were so poor, they could not afford to buy it. They were sieving filthy river water in an effort to remove disease. In another instance, an international company was allowed to indulge in open cast mining. They removed the people from the land, their only means of survival, and had brought their mine to within 100 yards of a village where the displaced were trying to scratch a living.

Under the WTO, these corporations do not have to put money into the local economy; they do not have to employ local labour; they do not have to take into account environmental concerns; and they do not have to restore the area to its original state. This is what the vast majority of anti—globalists are protesting about.

When the GATS deal is agreed, we shall all become third world countries with our assets owned by big business. We will become 21st century slaves whose survival will depend on how well we can grovel. What I want to know is what the corporations have offered these Government leaders that has persuaded them that the wellbeing of their people is no longer relevant.

FISHING

The EU takes a large slice of our overseas aid to spend on projects that they claim help the third world. Having allowed mainly Spanish boats to destroy fishing grounds around our coast (and our fishing industry in the process), the EU entered into agreements with many third world governments for EU boats to fish their waters —which has cost the British taxpayer more than £130 million.

One such deal was done with Morocco whose Government has now ordered the Spanish out of their territory because of the reckless way in which the Spanish have pillaged their waters, destroying fish stock, forcing local fishermen out of business and even killing them. The EU is to pay £122 million to compensate Spanish fishermen who can no longer fish off the Moroccan coast.

Channel 4 (16/11) showed a film about Mauritanian fishermen. The EU pays the Government £54 million to fish their waters — none of which finds its way to the fishing community. Fish stocks are disappearing which means local fishermen, in their small pirogues, have to go further out to sea where they are often run down by the large EU boats — some 300 have been killed to—date.

Meanwhile, in order to accommodate the Spanish fleet in all British waters by the end of 2002, the European Commission, abetted by the UK Government, are turning the screw on British fishermen. So draconian have the regulations become, 215 Scottish whitefish vessels, a third of the Scottish fleet, have applied to have their boats destroyed. Only £25 million has been allocated for this which will only pay off a fraction of the fishermen — hundreds will have to look for other jobs with no compensation. (Sunday Telegraph 18/11).

Compare that to the £122 million given in compensation to the Spanish fleet, not to destroy their livelihoods but to help them until the EU can find another third world country to exploit. With partners like these, can anyone still believe that EU interests are the same as ours?

BOOK REVIEW

Christopher Booker has written an excellent book entitled ‘Britain and Europe — The Culture of Deceit’. This is a small book which takes about an hour to read, but it covers the lies and deceit from the time we decided to join the EEC to the present day. It is a must for anyone who does not have time to read but wants to know the truth.

It is available from The June Press Ltd., P.O. Box 119, Totnes, Devon. TQ9 7WA. Price £4.35 (which includes post and package).

STOP PRESS For centuries, our armed forces and policemen have been given jubilee medals. For the Golden Jubilee, however, the Government has decided that the police should not receive one. Perhaps this is a hint that the Oath of Allegiance to the Queen is to be removed from the police force.

A Whitehall mole has said certain MPs have let it be known that they feel they should be recognised as servants of Her Majesty’s parliament and given a jubilee medal. They want all 659 MPs awarded in recognition of their work for the country. This, of course, would include the large contingent of Labour MPs who are republicans. I suggest the citation should read ‘For outstanding service to foreign powers

Have a wonderful Christmas and a smashing New Year — then come out fighting in 2002.

Mrs. Pam Barden.

All donations to the S.O.S. Fund or stamps will be greatly appreciated.

There is NO CopyRight on this document, which is one of many 1,000s of items freely available on http://www.SilentMajority.co.UK [some 20Mbs.] & 10s of 1,000s of items on The SilentMajority CD [with over 80Mbs.] which contains the entire web site & hosts other web sites also, 1,000s of apposite quotations, Articles, Speeches, Commentaries, ArtWork, & The FULL text of The EU Treaties, Several Related Books, The British Constitution, The American Constitution & Numerous related Items.
SilentMajority nor any associate thereof does NOT vouch for the veracity of the documents hosted on its site or CD nor any foreign language documents thereon & advises you consult your own solicitor on legal details as we do not accept liability for, nor presume to give legal advice ourselves.
For a copy of the CD please mail payment of £20.00 for UK deliver or £25.00 for ALL other Countries payable to:
Greg Lance – Watkins,
Glance Back Books,
17 Upper Church Street,
CHEPSTOW,
NP16 5EX
Monmouthshire,
GREAT BRITAIN
For delivery of 2 x CDs
one for your own use
+ one for on selling or donation to an individual of influence (media, politician, activist etc.)
IF YOU wish to use the Material Above, which is freely provided
Please have the Courtesy to Print It out in its entirety from start to finish with NO alterations, as displayed.
To This Point
.